Super Bowl 2021 spread, odds: Chiefs remain slight ...

super bowl scores odds

super bowl scores odds - win

[Sports] - Super Bowl 55 prop bets: From the coin toss to the player to score first TD to entertainment odds

[Sports] - Super Bowl 55 prop bets: From the coin toss to the player to score first TD to entertainment odds submitted by AutoNewsAdmin to USATODAYauto [link] [comments]

[Sports] - Super Bowl 55 prop bets: From the coin toss to the player to score first TD to entertainment odds | USA Today

[Sports] - Super Bowl 55 prop bets: From the coin toss to the player to score first TD to entertainment odds | USA Today submitted by AutoNewspaperAdmin to AutoNewspaper [link] [comments]

Super Bowl 55 Odds, Promos & Codes: Bet $20, Win $155 if There’s a Point Scored, Way More!

Super Bowl 55 Odds, Promos & Codes: Bet $20, Win $155 if There’s a Point Scored, Way More! submitted by sportsbetsnation to u/sportsbetsnation [link] [comments]

James Develin is Scoring on 66.7% of His Rushing Attempts this Season. He Currently Has 12/1 Odds to Score a TD at Any Point in Super Bowl LIII and 65/1 Odds to Score the First TD.

https://www.theduel.com/posts/6283605-james-develin-has-fascinating-odds-to-score-touchdown-in-super-bowl-liii
The man has half as many touchdowns (4) as he does rushing yards (8) this season.
submitted by SportsMonitor to nfl [link] [comments]

Super Bowl Squares Odds: How historically weird NFL scores and Patriots-Rams win probabilities impact your chances

Super Bowl Squares Odds: How historically weird NFL scores and Patriots-Rams win probabilities impact your chances submitted by JonnyFL to dataisbeautiful [link] [comments]

Wouldn’t it be hilarious if we made all of our text posts in the title? 🤣I mean, most text posts use less than 300 characters, so that limit is more than what we need to get our points across. Speaking of points, how about that Super Bowl? 13-3, one of the lowest scoring in history. Pretty odd, eh?

submitted by TheAlphaOmega21 to NoRules [link] [comments]

Super Bowl Squares Odds: The best and worst numbers (given weird NFL scores and Pats-Eagles win probabilities)

Super Bowl Squares Odds: The best and worst numbers (given weird NFL scores and Pats-Eagles win probabilities) submitted by action--jackson to dataisbeautiful [link] [comments]

[Analysis] 2015's NFL scores are the weirdest in history: makes Super Bowl Box / Square odds more equitable than ever before

submitted by johnsknownothing to nfl [link] [comments]

(US - TX) Odd question: Super Bowl Squares prizes - 4th quarter score vs. final score

Hi everyone --
In Super Bowl 51, there were surely tens of thousands of Super Bowl Squares games taking place throughout the country. If you're not familiar with the game, here's a quick rundown of how it works.
Last night's Super Bowl was the first time the game ever extended into overtime - the first time in 51 years this has happened.
I put together a 10x10 Super Bowl Squares board for my friends/coworkers, which I've done every year for nearly a decade. In the message I sent to everyone regarding it, I copied-and-pasted the same wording I've used in the past. In that message, I specify that the person in the correct square for the score at the end of the 4th quarter wins the grand prize of $1000 (image).
It is also worth noting that, in previous years, people usually asked me whether the 4th quarter score means anything if the game extends to overtime. In those years, I always clarified this detail, specifying that the $1000 grand prize correlates to the final score of the game (image from last year's game). Here are the facts of last night:
• Super Bowl 51 ended on Sunday evening, with a final score of Pats 34, Falcons 28
• The game ended in overtime – the first time a Super Bowl has ever gone to overtime (this didn’t happen in the previous 50 iterations of the event)
• At the end of the 4th quarter, the game was tied, 28-28
• Person 1 (Gal) is in possession of the [8,8] square, which was the correct score at the end of the 4th quarter
• Person 2 (Guy) is in possession of the [4,8] square, which was the correct final score at the end of the game
• In my original email about the Super Bowl Squares game, I specified that $1000 would be awarded to the correct score at the end of the 4th quarter
• In previous years, I often clarified that this referred to the end of the game (4th quarter or overtime), since someone always asked
• Nobody asked this year, so it was never clarified this year; it was an oversight on my part
• Both Guy and Gal have played in my Squares game for the past couple of years, so they understand the precedent
Letter-of-the-law (the wording of my 2017 email), Gal is clearly the winner. Spirit-of-the-game (historical precedence of my Squares game, and also what I think a reasonable participant would expect it to mean – the final score of the game, which has been at the end of the 4th quarter 50 of the previous 50 times, but ended up extending to overtime this year), Guy would be the winner.
This morning, both of them feel entitled to the entire $1000 prize, and I understand both of their rationale. My goal is to get them to agree to some kind of 50/50 split where they both win a bunch of money, but I’m not sure whether that’ll happen.
Could you please weigh in with how you'd handle this? Thanks for your help!
[edit: wording]
submitted by strooticus to legaladviceofftopic [link] [comments]

TIL that near the end of Super Bowl 46, the New England Patriots let the New York Giants score a touchdown, and the Giants tried to avoid scoring a touchdown, both to increase their odds of winning. The Giants involuntarily scored a touchdown but won anyway.

TIL that near the end of Super Bowl 46, the New England Patriots let the New York Giants score a touchdown, and the Giants tried to avoid scoring a touchdown, both to increase their odds of winning. The Giants involuntarily scored a touchdown but won anyway. submitted by TMWNN to todayilearned [link] [comments]

Super Bowl Squares Odds: Updated with 2015's Weird Scores & CAR-DEN Win Probabilities

submitted by pigeonpower to nfl [link] [comments]

[Request] - What are the odds of Madden 15 accurately predicting the score of Super Bowl XLIX?

[Request] - What are the odds of Madden 15 accurately predicting the score of Super Bowl XLIX? submitted by kidalive25 to theydidthemath [link] [comments]

2017 Super Bowl Odds: A First Look at Scoring Prop Bets for Atlanta Falcons Vs New England Patriots

submitted by Imared to TheColorIsRed [link] [comments]

If Fetty Wap ever plays the Super Bowl halftime show and the score just happens to be 17-38, I will be oddly satisfied.

submitted by Yile92 to Showerthoughts [link] [comments]

Super Bowl LV Game Thread: Kansas City Chiefs (14-2) at Tampa Bay Buccaneers (11-5) (First half)

Kansas City Chiefs at Tampa Bay Buccaneers

First Second Third Fourth Final
Buccaneers 7 14 10 0 31
Chiefs 3 3 3 0 9
  • General information
Coverage Odds
CBS, ESPN DEPORTES Tampa Bay +3.0 O/U 55.5
Weather
63°F/Wind 10mph/Clear sky/No precipitation expected
Discuss whatever you wish. You can trash talk, but keep it civil.
If you are experiencing problems with comment sorting in the official reddit app, we suggest using a third-party client instead (Android, iOS)
Turning comment sort to 'new' will help you see the newest comments.
Try Tab Auto Refresh to auto-refresh this tab.
Use reddit-stream.com to get an autorefreshing version of this page
Check in on the nfl chat: #reddit-nfl on FreeNode (open in browser).
Show your team affiliation - pick your team's logo in the sidebar.
submitted by nfl_gamethread to nfl [link] [comments]

Super Bowl LV Game Thread: Kansas City Chiefs (14-2) at Tampa Bay Buccaneers (11-5) (Second half)

Kansas City Chiefs at Tampa Bay Buccaneers

First Second Third Fourth Final
Buccaneers 7 14 10 0 31
Chiefs 3 3 3 0 9
  • General information
Coverage Odds
CBS, ESPN DEPORTES Tampa Bay +3.0 O/U 55.5
Weather
63°F/Wind 10mph/Clear sky/No precipitation expected
Discuss whatever you wish. You can trash talk, but keep it civil.
If you are experiencing problems with comment sorting in the official reddit app, we suggest using a third-party client instead (Android, iOS)
Turning comment sort to 'new' will help you see the newest comments.
Try Tab Auto Refresh to auto-refresh this tab.
Use reddit-stream.com to get an autorefreshing version of this page
Check in on the nfl chat: #reddit-nfl on FreeNode (open in browser).
Show your team affiliation - pick your team's logo in the sidebar.
submitted by nfl_gamethread to nfl [link] [comments]

GME: Next Steps

I've gotten more than a few DMs so I just want to offer my thoughts in a larger setting. I apologize for wasting others time and space.
Background: MBA w/+20 years including stints in Investment Banking, Equity Research, VC and Corporate. ( = I know enough to be dangerous.)
Should I invest tomorrow?
I would invest with the understanding that you're playing a high risk/high reward game vs. the best on Wall Street (WS) who aren't accustomed to losing. (Hell, you put a 50% dent in one of the most high profile HFs on the Street.) Reddit/WSB (WSB) is beating WS at its own game and WS will not accept that. The reason that I would still buy shares is because I'm perfectly comfortable waiting out the shorts, who I believe didn't cover entirely based on some sketchy trading volumes and price action on Thursday known as ladder attacks, which is basically artificially lowering a security's price by selling it back and forth between two parties. (Note: the WSJ is reporting that Melvin closed their positions at a loss of 50% to the fund. Maybe they did, though I don’t trust Melvin or the WSJ. Regardless, I have no doubt that other HFs are salivating at the short opportunity given where GME shares are currently trading.)
The key is the somewhat unreliable short data which comes out next week. As I mentioned in a previous post, getting accurate short data is next to impossible. It makes polling data look flawless by way of comparison. It has gotten to the point that I don't believe anything I read because there is not only time lag but synthetic longs and ladder attacks all of which serve to obscure the data. No firm wants it positions known so there is a strong incentive to obscure/hide the data. Another reason why Melvin publicly releasing its positions is just highly unusual/odd.
I would also be aware that a lot of HFs are making bank off the GME volatility by selling options and taking long positions. Just look at thetagang. The group is making their entire investment decisions based solely on the option premium without any concern for the underlying narrative to the point where they're short GME puts at the 200 strike. (And they think WSB is full of retards!)
To use an analogy, I'm a lifelong Giants fan who put a $1,000 down on the Giants beating the Pats in the 2008 Superbowl. The Pats went undefeated all season and the Giants entered the playoffs as a wildcard. The bookie even told me when I placed the bet that I was just throwing away my money. I bet the money line, i.e., no points, and ending up winning $5,000. The bookie just smiled at me when I handed him my ticket. Sometimes you just gotta trust your gut and stay loyal to your instincts no matter what others think. It's what separates the men from the boys.
TLDR: It’s a cliché, but don’t invest in GME what you can’t afford to lose. At this point, you're going against some very powerful hedge funds, i.e., the Pats in 2008. That said, WSB already scored a very impressive victory and is retarded enough to not realize how good their competition really is (just like the Giants in the Super Bowl).
How will the media portray the narrative?
The media have already started spreading the narrative that WSB is going to cause a financial collapse rather than the true culprits, namely, the HFs which leveraged up 5x to short 120% of a company's shares outstanding setting the stage for an infinity squeeze, which is the financial equivalent of a nuclear chain reaction. I mention this because the greatest risk IMHO is government intervention to quell the markets when the HFs start unloading positions to meet margin calls and borrowing costs. Nobody will lose sleep over a few billionaires losing a few commas in their net worth but hitting 401Ks, pension funds, and endowments is a different story. The official narrative will involve large commercial banks which loaned Melvin and other HFs billions to leveraged up with. These banks are regulated by the SEC and FDIC because they hold commercial deposits. When the narrative shifts from Melvin and HFs to names you recognize, e.g., JPM, BofA, Citi, rest assured the game is almost up. My guess is we're in the seventh or eighth inning of this game before it's stopped.
When people ask me about WSB I first discuss the HFs who created the conditions and then secondly note that thankfully we're dealing with a relatively small company in GME with a market cap of $20bn (so far!) compared to a company in the S&P 500, which is the basis for index funds and portfolio construction. In short, WSB did everyone a favor by calling attention to such a disastrous scenario in as optimal circumstances as possible. We should be very thankful WSB alerted the public to a systematic flaw in the financial system before a much greater meltdown occurred.
TLDR: The media are the PR firms for Wall Street. They exist to promote a narrative and receive access and compensation in return. They have no interest in reporting how the retail investor is being swindled. In contrast WSB did everyone a favor by pointing out a very serious systematic flaw in as optimal fashion as possible. This is the truth and the message that needs to be heard.
What’s the next step?
FINRA releases short data next Tuesday, February 9th for the period ending this past Friday, January 29th. Roughly 700mn GME shares changed hands last week or 10x the total shares outstanding so I'm pretty sure the short interest (SI) has fallen below 100%. However, I expect it to still be well above 50% given the typical HF’s risk appetite by which I mean they expect the retail investors to run for the exits sending shares back to $20-ish levels. I would love to know the borrowing costs for these firms because it basically tells you how long they can wait before such costs negatively impact their returns. My guess is until March when they have to report 1Q results to investors.
TLDR: Short data will show a decrease in SI, which is not necessarily a bad thing but it’s important to note that the risk/reward profile of the trade has moved.
How much good did this GME trade really do besides transfer a lot of wealth?
A heck of alot. At a minimum, WSB drew well needed scrutiny to the role of option clearings firms such as Citadel* and Wolverine, i.e., the shadow economy, and their dual roles as market makers and hedge funds (players and referees). This screams conflict of interest. A revolution doesn’t happen overnight but this is another step forward in demonstrating how rigged the game is against the retail investor and guy in the (Main) street. Our regulatory agencies exist to enforce transparency and fairness. WSB has demonstrated that the derivatives market and particularly short selling lack both and have the capability to cause a financial panic. And of course, there is the unbelievable amount of charitable donations from WSB gains which prove who the real Robinhood is. (Sorry, couldn’t resist).
TLDR: Sunlight is the best disinfectant – Justice Brandeis
*********************
For the questions below and messages:
As I tried to communicate in the write-up, I would characterize the trade as more risky than a week ago when the SI was above 100%. I have no doubt many shorts have since closed. That said, I suspect the SI is still well above 50% given where the stock is and typical HF risk appetite. This is not a trade for your parents or grandparents.* There is serious risk here that the share price collapses based on who the counterparties are and the lower SI. That said, I still like it and I'm in it. IMHO, it comes down to a game of chicken in the sense of who is willing to hold longer. HFs have investors to report to in 1Q vs. WSB who have bills, rent, and life to deal with. As my old coach would say, who wants it more.


submitted by sorengard123 to wallstreetbets [link] [comments]

Superbowl Conspiracies MegaThread

In honor of the big game, we are going to run through some of our favorite conspiracies surrounding the Superbowl:
  1. Games are fixed either by the NFL, the refs, or by the teams themselves (there are a ton of these)
--The tuck rule that gave the Patriots the title post 9/11 in 2001.
--The Blackout during Superbowl XLVII. In 2013, in order to prevent a blowout, the NFL had the stadium lose power in order for the 49ers to come back on the Ravens.
--The NFL screwing over the New Orleans Saints due to bountygate.
--In Superbowl LX, the refs were screaming about being underpaid so they called one of the worst games in superbowl history in order to force the league to pay them more.
a. Phantom flags. Phantom touchdowns.
b. After the game, the supervisor of NFL officiating caught a flight to South America
c. Later, one official said “"It was a tough thing for me," he said. "I kicked two calls in the fourth quarter, and I impacted the game, and as an official, you never want to do that."
  1. Sex Trafficking
--The theory began in the late 1980s although in a slightly different form--that domestic violence rates skyrocketed on game day and that Superbowl Sunday was the single biggest day for domestic violence each year. This led to a national movement and Congressional Act (championed by now President Biden) despite any evidence of this being true.
--In fact, the claim was debunked almost immediately in 1993 (three days after it first appeared in a major publication) but the claim still exists today.
--Eventually, the theory shifted to forced prostitution, sex trafficking, and even child prostitution.
--There seems to be an attempt to confuse traditional sexwork (which should be legalized) with illegal, harmful trafficking. The theory is that this confusion was intentionally spread by law enforcement to justify a near military state around the big game.
--Already Tampa Bay police are using this myth to justify low-level police stings to arrest people on misdemeanor prostitution charges.
--Important to note, that Robert Kraft (one of the wealthiest men in American and the owner of the New England Patriots) got two hand jobs during the Patriots 2019 playoff run. The massage parlor is a source of a number of crazy conspiracies mostly because a man worth $6 Billion tried to save $15 on a $59 massage by getting the early bird special.

  1. Half time shows
--Lady Gaga’s performance in 2017 was actually a carefully orchestrated Satanic Ritual. Gaga was scheduled to fly in from above with an army of drones signaling the rise of robots and the enslavement of humanity.
--Janet Jackson’s boob out was not a wardrobe malfunction. What is more important was the tribal sun pasty that covered up her nipple. The sun symbol appears on a lot of celebrities--Nick LeShea, Cisco, Adam Levine. This all relates back to the theory that Viacom--owners of CBS among other things--has deep ties to the Illuminati and their high priestess Beyonce. The goal is to take over mass rituals such as the halftime show or the VMA and usher in Illuminati symbolism.
--Good analysis on Bruno Mars’ halftime show in the context of the Illuminati is here

  1. Betting
--In 2015, someone bet a HUGE amount of money on a prop bet that the national anthem would take longer than 2 minutes and 2 seconds. The bet was placed shortly before the anthem. The anthem lasted 2 minutes and four seconds.
--Jim McMahon claimed that Coach Mike Ditka ran up a huge bet that William the Fridge Perry would score a touchdown during Superbowl XX. He did score the touchdown.
--Superbowl XLVII was rigged when the Seahawks blew out the Broncos. This was seen by the safety on the first play which has some of the best odds in prop betting.

We are going live a little earlier today (a little after Noon) so we don't interrupt anyone super spreader parties. Let us know if there is more we should cover.
CBM
submitted by ConspiracyBeerMe to conspiracyNOPOL [link] [comments]

Penn state huskers prediction!

What’s your predictions? 24-21 #GBR
submitted by InternationalSpace63 to Huskers [link] [comments]

Don't Panic: An Analysis of the 2020 Tampa Bay Buccaneers

A lot of us are having some major sports PTSD right now. Two years in a row, a team that beat the shit out of the Packers in the regular season is the Packers' opponent in the NFC Championship Game. Many wonder if history will repeat itself, and here are a few reasons why I think it won't.
#1: The 2020 Tampa Bay Buccaneers are not the 2019 San Francisco 49ers
Last year's 49ers were the best team in the league. I know they lost the Super Bowl, but they controlled that game for the majority of its duration, and they easily could have won if a few plays went differently (3rd and 15 being the most obvious). They had the best defense in the league (I know the Patriots were technically #1 last year but they played absolutely nobody and looked worse as the season progressed), and they had an incredibly efficient offense under Shanahan. That defensive line in particular is in my opinion an all-time great unit. It had: Nick Bosa, the defensive rookie of the year; DeForest Buckner, who is 1st-team All-Pro this year and earned 2nd-team All-Pro last year; Arik Armstead, who had 10 sacks over the season; and D.J. Jones, the least-decorated of the group, but a very solid piece who embarrassed Corey Linsley (the best center in football this year) on multiple snaps. That's just in insane group, and they were able to handily beat the Packers' O-Line by just rushing four. The defense had great linebackers behind that line, and one of the best secondaries in the NFL behind the linebackers. They were stacked.
The 2019 49ers were also just 7 points away combined from going 16-0. They lost by a field goal in OT to Seattle in a back-and-forth game, by a field goal on the road at the AFC 1 seed Ravens, and then by 1 point to the Falcons at home (I'm not counting the last fumble TD, which was borne out of a desperation play). 7 points away from being undefeated. And they were banged up vs the Falcons, too. The 2019 49ers were never not in control of a game they played. They were always competitive, even against elite competition. They won a few close games, but with the exception of their December games vs New Orleans and LA, ESPN's win probability meter never had them at significant odds to lose any of these. They were the best team in the league.
The 2020 Tampa Bay Buccaneers are not the best team in the league. They're 11-5 and they were swept by the Saints in blowout fashion and lost close games to the Bears, Chiefs, and Rams. They also struggled in several games which they ultimately won: they had a comeback vs the Chargers and were down by 17 at multiple points in their first game at Atlanta. Where the '19 49ers essentially played well against everyone on the schedule, the Buccaneers have struggled down the stretch. They ended up 11-5, but they very easily could be a 10-6 or even 9-7 team. They've shown vulnerability in multiple games, and a few of their losses were pretty ugly.
This brings me to my next point:
#2: Green Bay is a lot better than teams that have had success vs the Buccaneers this year
Green Bay got whooped by Tampa in week 6, but it remains the lone blowout loss the Packers have suffered in 2020. The Packers' other two losses this year were at Indianapolis and at home vs Minnesota. Both were very winnable games, and came down to one score. Given the broader context of the season, the Tampa game seems like an outlier more than anything. And last year, Green Bay suffered two blowout losses (prior to the third in the playoffs): at SF and at LAC.
To show how much of an outlier the Tampa game was, here's a DVOA stats comparison. I personally find DVOA a bit flawed in that it doesn't really account for how much teams can improve over the course of a season, but it's popular, so here:
Counting this week, Green Bay played 6 of the top 10 defenses by DVOA in the NFL this year, over 7 games. At New Orleans (#2), vs LAR (#4), at TB (#5), at SF (#6), at IND (#7), and then home and away vs Chicago (#8).
Their stats vs Tampa were: 10 points, 201 yards, 3.3 yards per play. Pretty ugly
Their stats in the other 6 games were, on average: 35 points, 389 yards, 6.5 yards per play. !!!
Minus the Tampa game, Green Bay has actually performed better than their season averages against top ten defenses. And it's not like Tampa was the best of the bunch! They were #5 and this^ includes two games against teams that ranked higher than them.
Green Bay (the #1 offense by DVOA) can compete against anybody. I think Tampa caught them on an off day, on the road, in the sun. And don't forget that Green Bay was up by 10 before the pick six and subsequent tipped-int. The Packers were wrecking the Buccaneers' gameplan until they started blitzing their middle linebackers off the edge and Rodgers got rattled and it was downhill from there. I don't think that'll happen twice, and the Packers' record against quality opponents reflects that.
But the Buccaneers have struggled against opponents of lesser quality than Green Bay. In some cases, far lesser quality. Here are a few statlines they've allowed:
vs KC (#2 offense by DVOA): 27 points, 543 yards, 7.5 yards per play
vs LAR (#10 offense by DVOA): 27 points, 413 yards, 5.8 yards per play
vs Carolina (#17 offense by DVOA): 17 points, 427 yards, 6.0 yards per play (they forced 4 turnovers this game, but it goes without saying that GB can't turn the ball over vs Tampa and expect to win)
2 games vs Falcons (#21 offense by DVOA): 27 points, 377 yards per game, 5.6 yards per play
3 games vs Saints (#7 offense by DVOA): 31 points per game, 328 yards per game, 4.9 yards per play
at WFT (#32 offense by DVOA, admittedly with Heinicke in this game): 23 points, 375 yards, 5.4 yards per play
vs LAC (#15 offense by DVOA): 31 points, 324 yards, 6.5 yards per play
Teams do move the ball against this defense. In some cases, they do it quite a lot. I don't know that it'll be realistic for Green Bay to hang 543 yards on Tampa, but hey, someone did it this year. And Green Bay just hung 484 on a Rams defense that hadn't allowed more than 390 all year.
The Rams and Falcons games really stick out to me, in particular. Tampa gave up 413 yards to the same Rams offense Green Bay held to 244 (admittedly without Kupp), and they gave up 377 on average in their two games against a Falcons team GB held to 327. These aren't crazy talented offenses (like GB is) and yet they put up solid numbers against the Buccaneers. If Green Bay has done their homework, and figured out an answer to Tampa's blitzing, I don't see any reason why they can't have the kind of success against the Buccaneers these teams did.

But what about the defense?
Okay, so remember what I said about DVOA? I think it's unfair to units that improve down the stretch of the season, and I think Green Bay's defense is definitely one of those units. Football Outsiders has GB ranked #17 on defense and I think that's kind of bullshit. The #17 defense doesn't hold Tennessee (#4 offense) to 14 points. The #17 defense doesn't allow an average of 287 yards, 16 points, and 4.8 yards per play down the stretch to three straight playoff teams in a row in Tennessee, Chicago, and LA (#4, #25, and #10 ranked offenses, respectively).
I'm gonna go with EPA on this one. EPA has Green Bay ranked #5 on defense since week 9 and I think that's reflective of how well this team has played down the stretch. Tampa's defense is #12 by this metric since week 9, by the way.
Anyway, #3: Green Bay actually has a defense to match Tampa's, and even exceed it depending on where you look
Green Bay's defense is really good this year. They were pretty average early in the season, but they've turned into an elite unit down the stretch. They've given up more than 400 yards once all year at Indianapolis, which is more than the Buccaneers can say, and they've performed similarly and better in cases against common opponents.
I think GB has the best secondary in football right now. Jaire is PFF's #1 CB, and Amos and Savage are both in its top 10 for safety rankings. King is serviceable, and guys like Sullivan and Redmond get the job done when called upon.
Z's been in PFF's top 15 edge rushers all year, and Gary made headlines this week because he's posted PFF grades above 90 against Tennessee and Chicago recently, and he posted above 80 against the Rams. That puts him among the best in the league right now. Clark just had a sack and a half against the Rams this week, and Preston's looked good recently, with some pressures and a few batted balls. This defensive front is scary. This defense is scary.
That brings me to my last point.
#4: It's different this time around.
This time around, it's at home. This time around, Green Bay's got a full season of Tampa's defense on tape. They can see how teams have racked up yards against them, and they can plan for the blitz looks Tampa hurled at them out of nowhere in week 6.
This time, it'll be below freezing outside as a Florida team travels a thousand miles north to play in the snow for the first time in many of their players' careers. They're gonna be tested by cold wind and sleet, and it'll be loud, too. There are gonna be thousands of fans in attendance, cheering the Packers on.
Tampa Bay is damn good. Tom Brady is damn good. His receivers are damn good. His running back is damn good. His offensive line (increasingly injured as it may be) is damn good. But Green Bay's offense is better.
Tampa Bay's defense is really good. But I think Green Bay's is better. If any secondary can match up against Godwin/Evans/Brown, it's Amos/Savage/Jaire. If any front four can get pressure on Brady, it's Z/Clark/Preston/Gary.
I think Green Bay's got this. I sure hope they do.
submitted by Caesaroctopus to GreenBayPackers [link] [comments]

How likely is every NFL stadium to host WrestleMania? An investigation

With the announcements of WrestleManias 37, 38, and 39, some users were critical of WWE selecting the same venues every year. Every WrestleMania since 23, with the exception of three in Orlando (two at the Citrus Bowl/Camping World Stadium and one at the Performance Center due to COVID-19), has been held at an NFL stadium. As something of an NFL stadium expert, I decided to examine each NFL stadium's likelihood of hosting a future WrestleMania. Please note that some stadiums are located just outside of the city limits listed, but I listed the major city most associated with it (so for instance, while AT&T Stadium is technically in Arlington, it hosts the Dallas Cowboys, so I listed Arlington.) I'm also giving WWE a significant benefit of the doubt and assuming they'd be interested in hosting a Mania outside of their usual go-tos.
Allegiant Stadium, Las Vegas, NV
Arrowhead Stadium, Kansas City, MO
AT&T Stadium, Dallas, TX
Bank of America Stadium, Charlotte, NC
Bills Stadium, Buffalo, NY
Empower Field at Mile High, Denver, CO
FedExField, Washington, DC (stadium located in Landover, MD)
FirstEnergy Stadium, Cleveland, OH
Ford Field, Detroit, MI
Gillette Stadium, Foxborough, MA
Hard Rock Stadium, Miami, FL
Heinz Field, Pittsburgh, PA
Lambeau Field, Green Bay, WI
Levi's Stadium, Santa Clara, CA
Lincoln Financial Field, Philadelphia, PA
Lucas Oil Stadium, Indianapolis, IN
Lumen Field, Seattle, WA
M&T Bank Stadium, Baltimore, MD
Mercedes-Benz Stadium, Atlanta, GA
Mercedes-Benz Superdome, New Orleans, LA
MetLife Stadium, New York, NY (located in East Rutherford, NJ)
Nissan Stadium, Nashville, TN
NRG Stadium, Houston, TX
Paul Brown Stadium, Cincinnati, OH
Raymond James Stadium, Tampa, FL
SoFi Stadium, Los Angeles, CA
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL
State Farm Stadium, Phoenix, AZ
TIAA Bank Field, Jacksonville, FL
US Bank Stadium, Minneapolis, MN
submitted by iamnotacola to SquaredCircle [link] [comments]

++>>Super Bowl++>>: Chiefs vs Buccaneers Live On Reddit

++Super Bowl++: Chiefs vs Buccaneers Live On Reddit
Buccaneers vs Chiefs Live Stream Reddit ANYWHERE
Click here: /live/16g3bjuqyis2c
Kansas City Chiefs vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers Live Super Bowl LV will be broadcast on CBS, the second time in three seasons the network will host the Super Bowl. You can watch the game FOR FREE on TV Channel
Live: Super Bowl
How to watch Super Bowl LV
When: Sunday, February 7, 2021
Kickoff time: 6:30 p.m. ET (3:30 p.m. PT)
Where: Raymond James Stadium in Tampa, Florida
Follow along with ProFootballTalk and NBC Sports for Super Bowl news, updates, scores, injuries and more
Get betting tools, DFS, season-long fantasy help, live odds and more for Super Bowl 2021 with Rotoworld Premium
Super Bowl Sunday 2021 is right around the corner and the Kansas City Chiefs and Tampa Bay Buccaneers are set to play in football’s biggest game. NBC Sports has you covered with the TV channel information and every live streaming option on Roku, Apple TV and more for Super Bowl LV. Plus, find out where to watch the game for free and options for anyone without cable.
Super Bowl MVP Patrick Mahomes and the 14-2 Kansas City Chiefs are looking to repeat as Super Bowl champions after last year’s victory over the San Francisco 49ers. Mahomes threw for 286 yards and two touchdowns with two interceptions, while Travis Kelce scored one touchdown on six receptions. This year, Mahomes will go up against Tom Brady and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. According to PointsBet, the Buccaneers are favorites over the Chiefs. Click here to bet on the game. Follow ProFootballTalk for more on the 2021 NFL Playoffs as well as game previews, recaps, news, rumors and more leading up to Super Bowl 2021.
The moment has finally come: Super Bowl LV is here. It'll be the Tampa Bay Buccaneers playing a rare home game as they take on the defending champion Kansas City Chiefs with the winner hoisting the Lombardi Trophy. For the Buccaneers, they find themselves back at Raymond James Stadium after winning three road playoff games in a row, including a victory in the NFC title game against MVP candidate Aaron Rodgers and his Green Bay Packers at Lambeau Field. As for the Chiefs, they took down arguably the hottest team in football in the Buffalo Bills in the AFC Championship Game and are now looking to become the first team since the 2003-04 Patriots to win back-to-back titles.
submitted by pkkhapaca30 to Music [link] [comments]

super bowl scores odds video

Super Bowl XXIV - 49ers vs Broncos - YouTube Super Bowl 54 Predictions, Picks and Odds  Sunday ... Super Bowl Odds 2020 - YouTube Super Bowl 2020 Odds: Chiefs, Ravens, 49ers Early ... 2020 NFL PLAYOFF PREDICTIONS! Super Bowl 54 Winner! FULL ... Terrible Take Tuesday (NFL Super Bowls Odds & Pass ... PROOF That Super Bowl 53 Was RIGGED by the NFL - YouTube Super Bowl 54 Predictions (NFL 2019-2020 Season ... 49ers vs. Chiefs  Super Bowl LIV Game Highlights - YouTube Bet On It - Super Bowl 54 Edition - Updated Odds ...

Super Bowl LV Betting Update. Spread: Chiefs -3 (Kansas City is drawing 61% of tickets and 69% of the handle). Total: 56.5 points (73% of tickets are on the over, while 59% of the handle is on the ... Your 2021 Super Bowl Squares Odds How historically weird scores and Chiefs-Bucs win probabilities impact your chances FEB 2 2021 Annual Odds (Year of Game): 2021 - 2020 - 2019 - 2018 - 2017 - 2016 Not Your Granddaddy's Super Bowl Boxes Odds are automatically updated once a day. Best Super Bowl 2021 US Sports Betting Bonuses & Offers. FanDuel Sportsbook – Sign up here to claim the FanDuel Bet $5 to win $275 + Offers below!. Bet $5 to Win $275 Welcome Bonus: Sign up at FanDuel Sportsbook and make a minimum $10 deposit to win $275 on your $5 Super Bowl bet. Super Bowl over/under ticks down. The over/under for Super Bowl LV opened at 57.5. There has never been a Super Bowl with a closing number on the over/under higher than 57. Now, it has examined the latest 2021 Super Bowl NFL odds and NFL betting lines from William Hill, simulated every snap 10,000 times, and its predictions are in. Head to SportsLine now to see them all. Super Bowl 2021 spread, odds: Chiefs remain slight favorites over the Buccaneers in Super Bowl LV How have the lines have moved for Super Bowl LV? Whether the Bucs can take the ball away from Kansas City in the Super Bowl could determine which team wins it. Gut-reaction predictions Our experts lean with the Chiefs in early picks 10-2. A Super Bowl future bet of $100 at +550 odds would profit $550 if the Chiefs win Super Bowl LVI in February, 2022. The Buccaneers, despite seven-time Super Bowl winning QB Tom Brady announcing he’ll be back in 2021, come in as the third-lowest odds (+1000 – bet $100, win $1,000) to repeat as Super Bowl champions. Super Bowl 2021 odds, favorite, spread, line According to PointsBet , the Kansas City Chiefs are this year’s favorite over the Tampa Bay Buccaneers to win the coveted Lombardi Trophy. Past Super Bowl Scores. At the bottom of this page we have links to pages that list the score by quarter for all of the past Super Bowls, from Super Bowl 1 to Super Bowl 55. We have also listed the last digit of the scores at the end of each quarter, which is typically used to decide the winning squares.

super bowl scores odds top

[index] [580] [4475] [6117] [3692] [5419] [6037] [4454] [4458] [1188] [454]

Super Bowl XXIV - 49ers vs Broncos - YouTube

2020 nfl playoff predictionssuper bowl 54 winner! full nfl playoff bracket predictions!#nflplayoffs #playoffpredictions The San Francisco 49ers take on the Kansas City Chiefs during Super Bowl LIV in Miami.Subscribe to NFL: http://j.mp/1L0bVBuCheck out our other channels:NFL V... Terrible Sports Takes of The Week including Odds to make it to the Super Bowl, Trey Flowers better than Khalil Mack, 49ers Super Bowl or Bust and news on the... The reigning Super Bowl champion Kansas City Chiefs are favored to repeat in 2020, according to odds released by Caesars Palace on Saturday. January 28, 1990Super Bowl XXIV Bar chart race of NFL Super Odds throughout the 2019 season, from early offseason to Championship weekend. Pigskin, Junior and Danny all make their Super Bowl 54 Predictions for the 2019-2020 NFL Season.TWITTER https://twitter.com/GoatHouseNFLEnjoy The Goat House... Super Bowl 2020 predictions, picks, and updated odds direct from the WagerTalk TV Studios in Vegas with Minty, Drew Martin, and Ralph Michaels. Super Bowl LI... I can't believe I've had to come back so soon to share the truth again, and they thought we wouldn't find out!Twitter: https://twitter.com/beardmohbox In this week's episode of Bet On It direct from Las Vegas, Kelly Stewart, Marco D'Angelo, Gianni "The Greek Gambler" and Ralph Michaels go over Super Bowl 54...

super bowl scores odds

Copyright © 2024 top.onlinerealmoneytopgames.xyz